top of page

Ten Best Practices for Governing the Fund Flow

jwm289
Sep 8
4 min read

Updated: Sep 9


According to a Borrell Associates study, roughly 40% of co-op funds (more than $14 billion annually) go unused. That is not a creativity problem. It is a governance and workflow problem: the same money, the same 40%, the same root cause on both sides of the channel - programs that run on spreadsheets, email, and memory. The ten practices below are what separate programs that run well from programs that quietly leak money. They come from conversations with the people who actually run co-op programs, and they apply whether you allocate the funds or claim them.


CONTROL

1.  Give the funds one owner and one record.

Co-op is the only budget four departments claim, but no one owns. Marketing administers it without financial authority, finance audits it without operational context, sales makes commitments nobody records, and IT sees a system request it never budgeted for. Name an owner, and put every request, approval, document, and payment in a single system of record — so “whose version is right?” becomes “here’s what happened.”

2.  Validate at submission, not at review.

Ask a co-op manager where the week went and the answer is opening attachments, cross-checking claims against a PDF of guidelines, and asking a dealer to resend a receipt. That is validation labor, and it is paid in salaried hours. Move it upstream: encode eligibility rules so a request is checked against them — with documentation attached — before it ever reaches a reviewer. Manual review isn’t diligence, it’s what diligence looks like without an underlying system.

3.  Read every rejection by stage.

A rejected request is data — if you know where and when it was rejected. An internal rejection is a training problem. A supplier denial is a program-fit problem. Lump them together and you can’t tell which lever to pull.


VISIBILITY

4.  Know your balance today, not six weeks from now.

Most program owners find out where they actually stand well after it matters. The failure modes are predictable: overcommit because approved-but-unpaid requests were never counted against the balance, or under commit and let funds expire in December. Every approved commitment should reduce the available balance the moment it is approved. You can’t steer what you can’t see.

5.  Track utilization and participation — and the gap between them.

Utilization is a money measure: the share of allocated dollars that got claimed. Participation is a headcount measure: the share of dealers or branches that claimed anything at all. A program can post 70% utilization with 25% participation, which shows sophisticated partners claiming everything while most of the channel never engages. The gap between the two is where unclaimed money hides, by branch and by supplier program, which means it is recoverable if you know where to look.

6.  Treat supplier funds as receivables — and know which ones are confirmed.

If a supplier owed you $50,000, you would invoice them. Co-op funds are the same money; most distributors simply never send the invoice. Age co-op receivables the way you age customer receivables — “approved” is not “collected” — and put slow-paying suppliers on a report. Then separate what is contractual, from what a rep who changed jobs in March estimated verbally. Confirmed versus estimated is the split that tells leadership what is real.


PROOF

7.  Keep an audit trail you could produce in an afternoon.

“Who approved this claim?” If the honest answer is “let me dig through my email,” the program is a liability. Public companies disclose co-op and vendor funding as a material financial control in their 10-K filings, and Robinson-Patman requires that promotional allowances be made available to competing customers on proportionally equal terms — inconsistency is exposure. Almost nobody is hiding anything; the process was just never designed to produce evidence. Every request, approval, document, and payment should be traced and timestamped.

8.  Capture results in the activity record, not in email.

Programs die in budget meetings, when a CFO asks “what did we get for this?” and the answer is a shrug dressed up as a slide. Make results a structured part of every activity record, and break spend down by activity type — events, digital, print, seminars — so program rules can favor what performs and cap what doesn’t. A program without activity data isn’t a marketing program; it is a rebate with extra steps.

9.  Report a correlation you can defend, not an attribution you can’t.

Nobody can honestly attribute revenue to a single co-op dollar. But there is a defensible middle ground between blind faith and false precision: trend co-op dollars deployed against channel sales, period over period, by region or dealer tier. When the regions that use their funds consistently outgrow the regions that don’t, you have something to stand in front of leadership with.


COLLABORATION

10.  Make the program easier to use than to ignore.

Every point of friction — the 30-page guideline PDF, the three-week pre-approval, the three-month reimbursement — is a filter, and it filters out busy dealers first, usually your best ones. Treat turnaround time as a trust metric with visible status at every step. Then give every party — manufacturer, distributor, dealer — one shared view of the rules, the balance, and the status of each request. Expectations only align when the record is shared.

If a program has stalled, it is rarely because co-op doesn’t work. The concept was right. The plumbing was broken.


FIVE QUESTIONS TO ANSWER BEFORE YOUR NEXT FUNDING PERIOD

1.     Who owns co-op funds in your organization?

2.     What is your available balance today, net of approved-but-unpaid commitments?

3.     What are your utilization and participation rates, and how far apart are they?

4.     Can you produce the full approval chain for any claim in an afternoon?

5.     How much of your funding expires this quarter — and who is responsible for claiming it?

If you can answer all five, your program is governed. If you can’t, the money is already moving — it just isn’t being managed.


Jeff McCandless (Founder) jwm@plaidmug.com

Bruce Meyer (Senior Sales) bruce@plaidmug.com




Recent Posts

See All
The Billion-Dollar Problem

Why Co-Op Funds Go Unused — and How to Fix It Executive Summary Across the manufacturer-distributor channel, co-op funds routinely go unclaimed. According to a Borrell Associates study, roughly 40%

 
 
 
Eliminating Administrative Waste in Co-Op Marketing

How a governed platform cuts co-op overhead by 50% or more Co-op marketing programs should be revenue accelerators. Too often, they operate as administrative burdens — consuming hours every week on em

 
 
 
You Can't Adjust What You Can't See

Real-time budget visibility for co-op marketing programs Here's a question most co-op program managers can't answer on demand: Where does every budget stand — right now? Not at quarter close. Not afte

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page